Dan Everett's been busy of late. He has been involved in a documentary about his beloved
Pirahã, and has a new book out. The documentary is called "
The Grammar of Happiness" and the book is called "
Language The Cultural Tool." Naturally, all this activity is firmly directed against the school of Chomsky and against Pinker's multi-million best-sellers. Everett appears intent intent on publicly discrediting the generativist/minimalist school.
Trailer for "The Grammar of Happiness"
The debate rages on about whether the Pirah
ã language has recursion or not (and if it does not, does it really matter), but just to stoke the fires higher, Everett has published a new book, called "Language The Cultural Tool." Yes, that's right. You would be hard pushed to pick a phrase that more succinctly says "No. Syntax is not autonomous." For years, generativists have been misrepresenting the ideas of Whorf and Sapir, not least in combining them into a mythical Whorf-Sapir hypothesis that simply does not exist. I hope that Everett is able to bring the debate back onto neutral ground and really tackle the question of how our language construes our perception of the world. For all his image as a 'radical' or 'the U.S. dissident', Chomsky's linguistics is deeply ideologically conservative (Chris Knight explains this very well in
Weekly Worker 655,
656 and
657). Maintaining that you do not need to analyse language linguistically in order to identify its power structures, or that habitual language use does not blind one to the legitimacy of incumbent power structures, contributes to the obscuring of the ideological role of language.
You can find reviews of the new book from
New York Times and
The Guardian, among others.
No comments:
Post a Comment